[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190647156.30132.92.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:19:16 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Dick Streefland <dick.streefland@...ium.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Together with the idea of not allowing multiple lines in the kprint_xxx
> functions, that would go with our approach having message numbers to
> identify a message.
How does this equate/give message numbers?
> If you do it like that, you can't support "%s", since then you would
> store only the pointer and not the whole string. I think, that we can't
> live without %s.
long long would not work either.
Perhaps it's better to scan the format string or indirect the
printk formatting logic.
Another possibility:
An added pass between gcc preprocessor and compiler could compact
or compress the format string without modifying the conversion
specifications so __attribute__ ((format (printf)) would still work.
printk could expand the compacted/compressed format.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists