[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709240835030.23830@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] new timerfd API - wire the new timerfd API to the
x86 family
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Davide,
>
> Is it perhaps not better to group the three syscalls contiguously with
> respect to syscall numbers? The old timerfd slot can be re-used for some
> other syscall later.
There's no problem if they're not contiguous. Holes, unless filled
immediately, need to be remembered to be filled.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists