[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F7F5C6.3030909@m3y3r.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:37:10 +0200
From: Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: nigel@...pend2.net, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3: kexec jump
Andrew Morton schrieb:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:24:34 +1000 Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Andrew.
>>
>> On Thursday 20 September 2007 20:09:41 Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>>> Seems like good enough for -mm to me.
>>>
>>> Pavel
>>>
>> Andrew, if I recall correctly, you said a while ago that you didn't want
>> another hibernation implementation in the vanilla kernel. If you're going to
>> consider merging this kexec code, will you also please consider merging
>> TuxOnIce?
>>
>>
>
> The theory is that kexec-based hibernation will mainly use preexisting
> kexec code and will permit us to delete the existing hibernation
> implementation.
>
> That's different from replacing it
Before replacing existing hibernation implementations, someone should
fix kexec for i386 (maybe others?) EFI systems...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists