[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070924175252.GA28347@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:52:52 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] Seq_file add support for sorted list
* Christoph Hellwig (hch@...radead.org) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:49:51PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Add support for sorted list in seq_file. It aims at changing the way
> > /proc/modules and kallsyms iterates on the module list to remove a race between
> > module unload and module/symbol listing.
> >
> > The list is sorted by ascending list_head pointer address.
>
> While I think we really want this patch I don't quite see how it's
> related to the markers. I think patch 1 and 2 stand on their own.
>
As they are currently implemented, the markers use the sorted module
list for marker listing, but I can change their implementation so they
do not require this (and make it a subsequent patch instead).
I could do that to diminish the patchset size a little more. However, it
implies using an interface with a known race condition. Could we just
post this as two different patchsets instead ? I really think the sorted
module list would be important to get in and I don't like to use buggy
unfixed lower level functions.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists