linux-kernel - Re: [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> static inline void __mark_check_format(const char *fmt, ...)
> 		__attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 2)))
> {
> }

the header file compiler-gcc.h defines the shorter macro "__printf".
is it worth encouraging its use, or does it matter?

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/