[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F80049.2030509@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:22:01 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@...am.de>
CC: linuxppc-embedded@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH4/4] [POWERPC] Fix cpm_uart driver
Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Scott Wood schrieb:
>> Jochen Friedrich wrote:
>>>
>>> In cpm_uart_core, functions cpm_uart_init_bd and cpm_uart_init_scc
>>> an offset into DP RAM is calculated by substracting a physical
>>> memory constant from an virtual address. This patch fixes the
>>> problem by converting the virtual address into a physical
>>> first.
>>
>> Huh? DPRAM_BASE is a virtual address. With this patch, you'd be
>> subtracting a virtual address from a physical address.
>
> Thanks for pointing me to it. So the bug is in cpm_uart_cpm1.h assigning
> a physical memory to DPRAM_BASE (at least on ARC=ppc). cpm_uart_cpm2.h
> seems to be correct though. I'll submit a new patch for this.
cpmp is a physical address on arch/ppc?
/me looks at arch/ppc/8xx_io/commproc.c
Yikes. Please don't change cpm_uart_cpm1.h, as it's correct for
arch/powerpc, and there are numerous other places that assume cpmp is
virtual (including in the very same function that assigns it a physical
address).
You could fix arch/ppc if you want, though it may be easier to wait for
it to die, and insist on identity maps in the meantime. :-)
-Scott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists