linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] ide: make ide_rate_filter() also respect PIO and SW/MW DMA mode masks (take 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200709242048.00192.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:48:00 +0200
From:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ide: make ide_rate_filter() also respect PIO and SW/MW DMA mode masks (take 2)

On Monday 24 September 2007, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Once I quothed:
> 
> >> Make ide_rate_filter() also respect PIO/SWDMA/MWDMA mode masks.  While 
> >> at it,
> >> make the udma_filter() method calls take precedence over using the 
> >> mode masks.
> 
> >    This one not looking to pretty -- I've geve some thought on how to 
> > beautify all these switch fallthoughs but haven't got something much 
> > better then uour original approach (AKA Occam's razor :-).
> 
>     So, it's probably better forget about this patch. But please do take patch 
> 4/4 to merge either before or after your "Occam's razor" -- it makes its best 
> at masking out the MWDMA modes anyways...

Sure, could you re-send patch 4/4 synced against current Linus' tree?

Thanks,
Bart
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/