[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070924184522.GA5013@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:45:22 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:43:09PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> gcc doesn't like it if I put the attribute after the function in the
> implementation. Should I leave it before or separate the prototype from
> the implementation ?
Just keep it where it was.
> > There seem to be a lot of exports and some functions that don't seem
> > to be used by the obvious marker use-cases like your example, blktrace
> > or sputrace. Care to explain why we'd really want them or better cut
> > them out for this first submission?
>
> If you are referring to the exports you just told about in this email,
> I'll remove them, they are not needed. As for the "marker_get_iter" and
> friends, they are used to list the markers (I provide a /proc interface
> to list the markers in the subsequent modules and also use it to dump
> the marker list in a trace channel at trace start so I can later
> understand the event data by using the format strings as type
> identifiers).
Sounds conceptually fine, but can we introduce this together with
the actualy users?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists