[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709241411120.30982@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Scott <nscott@...nex.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>,
swin wang <wangswin@...il.com>, totty.lu@...il.com,
joern@...ybastard.org
Subject: Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support)
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I've found some fixes needed on top of your Large Blocksize Support
> patches: I'll send those to you in a moment. Looks like you didn't
> try much swapping!
yup. Thanks for looking at it.
>
> I only managed to get ext2 working with larger blocksizes:
> reiserfs -b 8192 wouldn't mount ("reiserfs_fill_super: can not find
> reiserfs on /dev/sdb1"); ext3 gave me mysterious errors ("JBD: tar
> wants too many credits", even after adding JBD patches that you
> turned out to be depending on); and I didn't try ext4 or xfs
> (I'm guessing the latter has been quite well tested ;)
Yes, there were issues with the first releases of the JBD patches. The
current crop in mm is fine but much of that may have bypassed this list.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists