[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070924213215.GA32716@vino.hallyn.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:32:15 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Philipp Marek <philipp@...ek.priv.at>, 7eggert@....de,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
majkls <majkls@...pere.com>, bunk@...tum.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
Quoting David Newall (david@...idnewall.com):
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> there is no question that pivot_root is intended to have breadth for more
>> than one process.
>
> I think it's clear from the man page that the original idea was to be able
> to pivot_root for individual processes. The reason it doesn't do that, the
> reason it affects all processes, is to work around the bootstrap problem,
> where processes that don't care what their root (or current) directory is
> are still using the original root.
>
> An extra parameter could be added to specify which behavior is desired,
> probably defaulting to the current behavior. That would remove the need to
> use a chroot bug.
No reason for any new parameters to pivot_root. Just clone your mounts
namespace first.
unshare(CLONE_NEWNS);
chdir(new_dir);
pivot_root(new_dir, oldroot);
Since pivot_root actually fiddles with the vfsmnts, this is really the
only way to go about having it "work with just one process".
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists