lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709240647140.1295@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:49:44 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.22.7 autoconf.h is screwed up

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote:

> hello rday,
>
> On 9/24/07, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> >
> > > hello rday,
> > >
> > > In my view autoconf.h is the index of kernel you are using. By
> > > reading autoconf.h you will know what Architecture, drivers is
> > > selected.
> > >
> > > For example, If we are using some ARM based board, If you give me
> > > your autoconf.h , I can replicate same environment as yours. If it
> > > is not properly formatted it is very difficult to read and come to
> > > some conclusion.
> >
> > no, the proper thing to do is give someone your .config file if you
> > want them to reproduce your configuration, and leave autoconf.h out of
> > it.
> >
>
> yes, you are right. So autoconf.h is obsolete and replaced by .config
> . And now autoconf.h looks so funny and scary that no body dares to
> open autoconf.h in future ;-)

no, you're missing the point.  the .config file represents your
selection of kernel options, it's what you can hand to someone if they
want to reproduce your configuration.  autoconf.h, on the other hand,
is automatically generated from your .config file once you start the
build process.  it is in no way "obsolete", it's used by the build
process -- it's just not meant to be manipulated by users.

don't worry about autoconf.h, just leave it alone -- the build process
takes care of it.

rday

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ