lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070925005945.02E924D04B7@magilla.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: ptrace CHECK_FULL_REGS

> Yup, I think I ditched most of them.. for some reason I decided it
> couldn't happen, but maybe I'm wrong ?

Well, it's a BUG_ON.  It's supposed to be for something that "can't happen".
That's why it's a sanity check, not a wild assertion. ;-)

The 2/2 patch is an example of a bug that CHECK_FULL_REGS catches.
In the status quo, using PTRACE_PEEKUSR in a bug case crashes while using
PTRACE_GETREGS in the same place might get bogus data.  (In the actual bug
thus found, the data is not bogus and only the bit that FULL_REGS checks is.)


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ