lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709251452.01415.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:52:00 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 and -rc6-mm1: boot failure on HP nx6325, related to clockevents

On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > As i can see from the log, you are booting on computer with dualcore AMD
> > > > > processor. Do you have C1E feature enabled? 
> > 
> > That's possible, how to check?
> > 
> > > > > i386 kernel disable lapic on dualcore AMD with C1E support (see 
> > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/29/199). x86_64 kernel do not have this
> > > > > patch still (it's required for tickless kernel only).
> > > > 
> > > > Well it is required for non tickless mode as well.
> > > > 
> > > > >  As result, if
> > > > > you run x86_64 kernel with hrt patch on such computer, the system
> > > > > will stall during boot on lapic timer calibration.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks for the reminder. I have a look into this.
> > > 
> > > Can you please boot mainline and provide the output of:
> > > 
> > > # cat /proc/interrupts; sleep 10; cat /proc/interrupts
> > 
> > albercik:~ # cat /proc/interrupts; sleep 10; cat /proc/interrupts
> >            CPU0       CPU1
> >   0:    1159492          0  local-APIC-edge      timer
> > LOC:          0    1158220   Local interrupts
> >
> >   0:    1161996          0  local-APIC-edge      timer
> > LOC:          0    1160723   Local interrupts
> 
> Hmm. That's strange. It looks like the local apic timer is not used, but
> x86_64 definitely lacks the above check.

Ouch, sorry.  This is from the kernel booted with "noapictimer".

I'll get the correct output in a little while.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ