linux-kernel - Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070925125129.GA26310@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:21:29 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 12:36:17PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> hm. perhaps this fixup in kernel/sched.c:set_task_cpu():
> 
>         p->se.vruntime -= old_rq->cfs.min_vruntime - new_rq->cfs.min_vruntime;

This definitely does need some fixup, even though I am not sure yet if
it will solve completely the latency issue.

I tried the following patch. I *think* I see some improvement, wrt
latency seen when I type on the shell. Before this patch, I noticed
oddities like "kill -9 chew-max-pid" wont kill chew-max (it is queued in
runqueue waiting for a looong time to run before it can acknowledge
signal and exit). With this patch, I don't see such oddities ..So I am hoping 
it fixes the latency problem you are seeing as well.



Index: current/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- current.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ current/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1039,6 +1039,8 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p,
 {
 	int old_cpu = task_cpu(p);
 	struct rq *old_rq = cpu_rq(old_cpu), *new_rq = cpu_rq(new_cpu);
+	struct cfs_rq *old_cfsrq = task_cfs_rq(p),
+		      *new_cfsrq = cpu_cfs_rq(old_cfsrq, new_cpu);
 	u64 clock_offset;
 
 	clock_offset = old_rq->clock - new_rq->clock;
@@ -1051,7 +1053,8 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p,
 	if (p->se.block_start)
 		p->se.block_start -= clock_offset;
 #endif
-	p->se.vruntime -= old_rq->cfs.min_vruntime - new_rq->cfs.min_vruntime;
+	p->se.vruntime -= old_cfsrq->min_vruntime -
+					 new_cfsrq->min_vruntime;
 
 	__set_task_cpu(p, new_cpu);
 }
 

--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/