linux-kernel - Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200709251525.11752.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:25:10 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
Cc:	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>,
	Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>,
	Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)

On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:53, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:05, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 11:58, Damien Wyart wrote:
> >>>>>>> No, I do not have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP set,
> >>>>>>> because I do not have CONFIG_PM_SLEEP set,
> >>>>>>> because I do not want SUSPEND and/or HIBERNATION.
> >>>>>> Same answer from my side: I do not have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP for the same
> >>>>>> reason (and this worked fine without them in rc7). I do not think
> >>>>>> these settings should have changed between rc7 and rc8.
> >>>> Well, we haven't changed much.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Also, another test I just did: on another computer, rc8 is fine
> >>>>> regarding ACPI power off, even if CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is not set. I can
> >>>>> provide config if needed.
> >>>> On the box that fails to power off, can you please test -rc8 with these two
> >>>> commits reverted:
> >>>>
> >>>> commit 5a50fe709d527f31169263e36601dd83446d5744
> >>>> ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states addendum
> >>>>
> >>>> commit f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2
> >>>> ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states.
> >>>>
> >>>> and see if it works?
> >>> If it does, please test the patch from this message
> >>>
> >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119052978117735&w=4
> >>>
> >>> on top of vanilla 2.6.23-rc8.
> >> You will need one more patch on top of just mentioned one.
> > 
> > Hm, why did you put acpi_target_sleep_state under CONFIG_SUSPEND?
> > 
> > CONFIG_HIBERNATION needs acpi_target_sleep_state  too.
> Agree, attaching updated patch.

Well, please use "ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP" instead of
"if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)||defined(CONFIG_HIBERNATION)",
as you did with the second block.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/