linux-kernel - Re: Linux Kernel Markers - performance characterization with large IO load on large-ish system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46F92219.9020406@hp.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:58:33 -0400
From:	"Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	btrace <linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Markers - performance characterization with large
 IO load on large-ish system

Taking Linux 2.6.23-rc6 + 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 as a basis, I took some sample 
runs of the following on both it and after applying Mathieu Desnoyers 
11-patch sequence (19 September 2007).

    * 32-way IA64 + 132GiB + 10 FC adapters + 10 HP MSA 1000s (one 72GiB
      volume per MSA used)

    * 10 runs with each configuration, averages shown below
          o 2.6.23-rc6 + 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 without blktrace running
          o 2.6.23-rc6 + 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 with blktrace running
          o 2.6.23-rc6 + 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 + markers without blktrace running
          o 2.6.23-rc6 + 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 + markers with blktrace running

    * A run consists of doing the following in parallel:
          o Make an ext3 FS on each of the 10 volumes
          o Mount & unmount each volume
                + The unmounting generates a tremendous amount of writes
                  to the disks - thus stressing the intended storage
                  devices (10 volumes) plus the separate volume for all
                  the blktrace data (when blk tracing is enabled).
                + Note the times reported below only cover the
                  make/mount/unmount time - the actual blktrace runs
                  extended beyond the times measured (took quite a while
                  for the blk trace data to be output). We're only
                  concerned with the impact on the "application"
                  performance in this instance.

Results are:

Kernel                                 w/out BT   STDDEV     w/ BT    STDDEV
-------------------------------------  ---------  ------   ---------  ------
2.6.23-rc6 + 2.6.23-rc6-mm1            14.679982    0.34   27.754796    2.09
2.6.23-rc6 + 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 + markers  14.993041    0.59   26.694993    3.23

It looks to be about 2.1% increase in time to do the make/mount/unmount 
operations with the marker patches in place and no blktrace operations. 
With the blktrace operations in place we see about a 3.8% decrease in 
time to do the same ops.

When our Oracle benchmarking machine frees up, and when the 
marker/blktrace patches are more stable, we'll try to get some "real" 
Oracle benchmark runs done to gage the impact of the markers changes to 
performance...

Alan D. Brunelle
Hewlett-Packard / Open Source and Linux Organization / Scalability and 
Performance Group

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/