[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070925103142.c93719b3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:31:42 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Greg.Chandler@...lsfargo.com, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Kernel compile bug in 2.6.22.6/7 {maybe more}
ARM/StrongARM
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:22:55 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc5/2.6.21-rc5-mm3/broken-out/fix-x86_64-mm-sched-clock-share.patch
> >
> > So I guess what we want to do here is to revert that patch, test i386
> > allnoconfig and then fix up anything which breaks.
>
> Nothing breaks for me with make ARCH=i386 bzImage on my x86-64 box
> (which should be the same as a native build).
Was that with allnoconfig?
> The functions that complain in that patch header don't seem to actually
> exist in mainline at all. (`init_sched_clock' and `call_r_s_f')
> Did this patch perhaps jump the gun, and these are -mm only ?
Could be that this patch fixed version 17 of sched-clock-share and we ended
up merging verion 56. It was awful.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists