[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190762025.26982.315.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:13:45 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix sys_mknodat breakage from r/o bind mounts
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:58 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> mknod("foo", 0644) returns EINVAL, even though it should succeed.
Just to clarify, this is for when we use mknod to create normal,
non-device files, right? Your fix looks very correct to me.
I'm curious, do you have a normal program that uses mknod(2) this way?
I'd like to add it to my test scripts.
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists