linux-kernel - Re: Chroot bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:20:54 +0930
From:	David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
	Philipp Marek <philipp@...ek.priv.at>, 7eggert@....de,
	majkls <majkls@...pere.com>, bunk@...tum.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Chroot bug

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:05:07 +0930
> David Newall <david@...idnewall.com> wrote:
>> Alan Cox wrote:
>>     
>>>> Marek's loading dynamic libraries, it seems clear that the prime purpose 
>>>> of chroot is to aid security.  Being able to cd your way out is handy 
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Does it - I can't find any evidence for that.
>>>       
>> It seems self-evident to me.  What do you think is it prime purpose?
>>     
>
> Debugging and testing. At least that is as I understand it much of where
> it came from.
>   

Good call.  Though I suppose, since it's used 24x7 to aid security on 
countless production servers, that security dwarfs testing.  Still, 
debugging, yes that's valid.

I don't suppose it makes and difference; whatever the purpose, a chroot 
that doesn't change the root is buggy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/