[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190793869.3240.14.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:04:29 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 11:47 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Maybe there's more to come: if we can get CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED to work
> properly then your Xorg will have a load-independent 50% of CPU time all
> to itself. (Group scheduling is quite impressive already: i can log in
> as root without feeling _any_ effect from a perpetual 'hackbench 100'
> running as uid mingo. Fork bombs no more.) Will the Amarok gforce plugin
> like that CPU time splitup? (or is most of the gforce overhead under
> your user uid?)
>
> it could also work out negatively, _sometimes_ X does not like being too
> high prio. (weird as that might be.) So we'll see.
I piddled around with fair users this morning, and it worked well. With
Xorg and Gforce as one user (X and Gforce are synchronous ATM), and a
make -j30 as another, I could barely tell the make was running.
Watching a dvd, I couldn't tell. Latencies were pretty darn good
throughout three hours of testing this and that.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists