linux-kernel - Re: [patch 5/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on ppc64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:15:34 +0200
From:	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] Use extended crashkernel command line on ppc64

Hi,

* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> [2007-09-25 21:45]:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:23:02 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de> wrote:
> 
> > This patch adapts the ppc64 code to use the generic parse_crashkernel()
> > function introduced in the generic patch of that series.
> 
> I really don't like to see patches get a wholesale replacement, especially
> when they've been looked at by a few people and have had some testing, etc.
> It's not possible to see what changed and people need to re-review stuff
> they've already reviewed, etc.

Sorry, I didn't know that this is the preferred way. I just thought
it's more clear if the patches are replaced if the patch set is
finally pushed into Linus' tree.

> diff -puN arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c~use-extended-crashkernel-command-line-on-ppc64-update
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ NORET_TYPE void machine_kexec(struct kim
>  
>  void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned long long crash_size = 0, crash_base;
> +	unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* this is necessary because of lmb_phys_mem_size() */
> _
> 
> 
> which I suspect will now create a compiler warning.

No, it doesn't. I just verified this.

  CHK     include/linux/compile.h
  CC      arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.o
  LD      arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o


Thanks,
   Bernhard
-- 
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>, Architecture Maintenance
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
OpenPGP: F61F 34CC 09CA FB82 C9F6  BA4B 8865 3696 DDAF 6454
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/