[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46FA4313.1060201@Arcor.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:31:31 +0200
From: Henry Nestler <Henry.Ne@...or.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: kbuild: LDFLAGS_MODULE unusable for external module builds (2.6.23-rc2)
Hello Sam,
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>>> What macro should set for linker parameters of foo.o ? I'm not shure.
>>> Have you read:
>>> Documentation/kbuild/makfilefiles.txt?
>> Yes. This was a *very* helpfull. And many examples spokes about
>> LDFLAGS_$@ there. Not directly described for modules.
>
> Took a deeper look.
> I saw one reference to LDFLAGS_$@ that is wrong:
> LDFLAGS Generic $(LD) options
>
> Flags used for all invocations of the linker.
> Often specifying the emulation is sufficient.
>
> Example:
> #arch/s390/Makefile
> LDFLAGS := -m elf_s390
> Note: EXTRA_LDFLAGS and LDFLAGS_$@ can be used to further customise
> the flags used. See chapter 7.
>
> The chapter reference is also bad...
> The other references to the LDFLAGS_$@ are in other situations - it is
> used in several places.
>
> If your example requires the LDFALGS_$@ I wil introduce it - for now
> it has not been required (except for vdso support where it was hacked).
I will check EXTRA_LDFLAGS compatibilities with older kernel versions.
Than I come back with results. Currently I no need LDFLAGS_$@.
--
Henry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists