[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709261633.24283.caglar@pardus.org.tr>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:33:22 +0300
From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v22, for v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7, v2.6.20.20
26 Eyl 2007 Çar tarihinde, Ingo Molnar şunları yazmıştı:
> By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler. It is a
> full backport of the latest & greatest sched-devel.git code to
> v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and v2.6.20.20. The patches can be
> downloaded from the usual place:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/
>
> This is the first time the development version of the scheduler has been
> fed back into the stable backport series, so there's many changes since
> v20.5:
Compilation [against 2.6.20.20] fails with
buildfarm linux-2.6.20 # make
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC kernel/sched.o
In file included from kernel/sched.c:850:
kernel/sched_fair.c:49: error: sysctl_sched_nr_latency causes a section type
conflict
make[1]: *** [kernel/sched.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error 2
@kernel/sched_fair.c
-const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_nr_latency __read_mostly = 20;
+const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_nr_latency = 20;
seems solve that issue but i'm not sure this is the right thing to do or
not :)
Cheers
--
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/
Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists