[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070926151458.GA10460@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:14:58 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: subsystem_unregister() breakage in -mm
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:21:56AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:41:21 -0700,
> Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok, here's a patch that fixes this for me. It should go on top of the
> > -mm tree. Let me know of this works or not.
>
> Looks sane to me.
>
> > In the end, we need to dynamically allocate these subsystems to properly
> > fix this. In looking through the tree, there really isn't that many of
> > them, so I'll try to knock that out later this week.
>
> What they need at least is a dynamically allocated k_name.
Yes :(
> Same goes
> for all those objects that use set_kset_name(), and there are quite a
> few of those...
Almost all of those are the stupid sysdev_class and sys_device stuff. I
_really_ want to get rid of those as they should be a "normal"
device/driver/class. I think Adam Belay has some patches he is working
on to get rid of these, but I do not know the status of them.
Anyway, they are static structures, so my fix will keep them from
oopsing.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists