[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070926161602.GA26909@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:16:02 +0200
From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] Extended crashkernel command line
* Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz> [2007-09-25 22:53]:
>
> > + *
> > + * The function returns 0 on success and -EINVAL on failure.
> > + */
> > +static int __init parse_crashkernel_mem(char *cmdline,
> > + unsigned long long system_ram,
> > + unsigned long long *crash_size,
> > + unsigned long long *crash_base)
> > +{
> > + char *cur = cmdline;
> > +
> > + /* for each entry of the comma-separated list */
> > + do {
> > + unsigned long long start = 0, end = ULLONG_MAX;
> > + unsigned long long size = -1;
>
> memparse(), as a wrapper for somple_strtoll(), always have a return value
> (zero by default).
> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/583426>
Ok, that's fixed now, see patch below.
> And why not to make overall result reliable? This is kernel after all.
>
> I.e. if there's valid `crashkernel=' option, but some parsing errors, why
> not to apply some heuristics with warning in syslog, if user have some
> conf, bootloader (random) errors, but feature still works?
I'm against guessing. The user has to specify a parameter which is
right according to syntax.
However, I plan to make a patch that the kernel can detect a sensible
offset automatically for i386 and x86_64 as it's done in ia64. Since
both architectures have a relocatable kernel now, that makes perfectly
sense. But that's another patch.
---
This patches improves error handling in parse_crashkernel_mem() by comparing
the return pointer of memparse() with the input pointer and also replaces
all printk(KERN_WARNING msg) with pr_warning(msg).
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
---
kernel/kexec.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/kexec.c
+++ b/kernel/kexec.c
@@ -1172,33 +1172,50 @@ static int __init parse_crashkernel_mem(
do {
unsigned long long start = 0, end = ULLONG_MAX;
unsigned long long size = -1;
+ char *tmp;
/* get the start of the range */
- start = memparse(cur, &cur);
+ start = memparse(cur, &tmp);
+ if (cur == tmp) {
+ pr_warning("crashkernel: Memory value expected\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ cur = tmp;
if (*cur != '-') {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "crashkernel: '-' expected\n");
+ pr_warning("crashkernel: '-' expected\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
cur++;
/* if no ':' is here, than we read the end */
if (*cur != ':') {
- end = memparse(cur, &cur);
+ end = memparse(cur, &tmp);
+ if (cur == tmp) {
+ pr_warning("crashkernel: Memory "
+ "value expected\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ cur = tmp;
if (end <= start) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "crashkernel: end <= start\n");
+ pr_warning("crashkernel: end <= start\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
}
if (*cur != ':') {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "crashkernel: ':' expected\n");
+ pr_warning("crashkernel: ':' expected\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
cur++;
- size = memparse(cur, &cur);
+ size = memparse(cur, &tmp);
+ if (cur == tmp) {
+ pr_warning("Memory value expected\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ cur = tmp;
if (size < 0) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "crashkernel: invalid size\n");
+ pr_warning("crashkernel: invalid size\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists