[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <863e9df20709260952p3cc99b02n15e411a9b29b9fd4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:22:04 +0530
From: "Abhishek Sagar" <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>
To: ananth@...ibm.com
Cc: "Avishay Traeger" <atraeger@...sunysb.edu>, prasanna@...ibm.com,
anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KPROBES: Instrumenting a function's call site
On 9/26/07, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com> wrote:
> PS: There was a thought of providing a facility to run a handler at
> function entry even when just a kretprobe is used. Maybe we need to
> relook at that; it'd have been useful in this case.
That would be really useful. I was writing a tool to dump some
function profiling info through /proc. This would help save an extra
probe on each function's entry.
-
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists