[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190830667.20235.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:17:47 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] just rename call_rcu_bh instead of making it a macro
Seems that I found a box that has a config that passes call_rcu_bh as a
function pointer (see net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c), so declaring the
call_rcu_bh has a macro function isn't good enough.
This patch makes it just another name of call_rcu for rcupreempt.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc8-rt1/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.23-rc8-rt1.orig/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc8-rt1/include/linux/rcupreempt.h
@@ -42,9 +42,14 @@
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
-#define rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu)
-#define rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu)
-#define call_rcu_bh(head, rcu) call_rcu(head, rcu)
+#define rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu) do { } while (0)
+#define rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu) do { } while (0)
+/*
+ * Someone might want to pass call_rcu_bh as a function pointer.
+ * So this needs to just be a rename and not a macro function.
+ * (no parentheses)
+ */
+#define call_rcu_bh call_rcu
extern void __rcu_read_lock(void);
extern void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists