linux-kernel - Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070926033827.GB3899@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:38:27 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>, James.Bottomley@...elEye.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:34:00PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Well, sure, the driver is the owner of that memory.
> 
> We're talking about common code.
> 
> If everybody agrees SHT is R/W in the core, Fujita-san's patch is fine.

Oh ... harder to find, but scsi_module.c does that, as does
scsi_register/scsi_unregister.  OK, those are legacy, but they still
exist today.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/