linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] QoS params patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:37:33 -0700
From:	Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] QoS params patch

On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:05:15PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:24:40 +0900 Paul Mundt wrote:
> 
> > > +/* static helper functions */
> > > +static s32 max_compare(s32 v1, s32 v2)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (v1 < v2)
> > > +		return v2;
> > > +	else
> > > +		return v1;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static s32 min_compare(s32 v1, s32 v2)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (v1 < v2)
> > > +		return v1;
> > > +	else
> > > +		return v2;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > min()/max() instead?
> 
> Other code wants function pointers to the min & max functions.
> That's why they are here AFAICT.
> 
> 
> > > +/* assumes qos_lock is held */
> > > +static void update_target(int i)
> > > +{
> > 'target' might be a more meaningful variable name.
> 
> Anything but 'i'.

The 'i' is gone.  Will post new patch later today.

--mgross
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/