linux-kernel - Re: lockdep wierdness...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1190908700.31636.9.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:58:20 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: lockdep wierdness...

On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 15:00 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:51:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Christoph,
> > 
> > does Steve's story make sense? 
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > All that would need to be done is add an extra lock_class_key to
> > file_system_type for i_mutex_dir_key, and extend alloc_inode to say
> > something like:
> > 
> >   if (dir)
> >     lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_mutex, &sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key);
> >   else
> >     lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_mutex, &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key);
> 
> Unfortunately we don't know what type of inode we have when calling
> alloc_inode.  We only know it after reading in the inode from disk,
> aka in unlock_new_inode.  Then again there is no reason to use
> i_mutex before unlock_new_inode returns, so maybe we could defer
> initializing it until unlock_new_inode.  I'm pretty sure we'll have
> to fix a few filesystems that take i_mutex before that despite not
> needing it, e.g. through i_size_write, though.

How about this:

---
Make a distinction between file and dir usage of i_mutex.

The inode should be complete and unused at unlock_new_inode(), re-init
i_mutex depending on its type.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
 fs/inode.c         |   12 ++++++++++++
 include/linux/fs.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/inode.c
@@ -576,6 +576,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(new_inode);
 
 void unlock_new_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+	struct file_system_type *type = inode->i_sb->s_type;
+	/*
+	 * ensure nobody is actually holding i_mutex
+	 */
+	mutex_destroy(&inode->i_mutex);
+	mutex_init(&inode->i_mutex);
+	if (inode->i_mode & S_IFDIR)
+		lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_mutex, &type->i_mutex_dir_key);
+	else
+		lockdep_set_class(&inode->i_mutex, &type->i_mutex_key);
+#endif
 	/*
 	 * This is special!  We do not need the spinlock
 	 * when clearing I_LOCK, because we're guaranteed
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1426,6 +1426,7 @@ struct file_system_type {
 
 	struct lock_class_key i_lock_key;
 	struct lock_class_key i_mutex_key;
+	struct lock_class_key i_mutex_dir_key;
 	struct lock_class_key i_alloc_sem_key;
 };
 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/