linux-kernel - Re: correct kernel parameter in documentation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709271202210.13117@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:03:33 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: correct kernel parameter in documentation.

On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Dave Jones wrote:

> 'noacpi' isn't a standalone parameter, give it its prefix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 4d175c7..a87bc58 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -863,6 +863,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
>  	lasi=		[HW,SCSI] PARISC LASI driver for the 53c700 chip
>  			Format: addr:<io>,irq:<irq>
>
> +	libata.noacpi	[LIBATA] Disables use of ACPI in libata suspend/resume
> +			when set.
> +			Format: <int>
> +

if you're going to add that libata-related parm to the kernel parms
file, wouldn't it make sense for consistency to add the other
available boot-time parms from libata-core.c as well?  it seems
counter-productive to document only a subset of them from the same
source file.

rday

p.s.  as i think i've mentioned before, i'd prefer to see that entire
kernel-parameters.txt file reorganized, where the basic boot time
parms are at the top, followed by module specific parameters *after*
that, in alphabetical order by module name.  i think that would make
far more sense.

-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/