[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070927.121522.52884745.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jengelh@...putergmbh.de
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, helge.hafting@...el.hist.no,
olecom@...wer.upol.cz, jbeulich@...ell.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why network devices don't do reference counting?
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:55:36 +0200 (CEST)
>
> On Sep 27 2007 07:51, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> >You need every socket to close and all routes to go away including the
> >routes through loopback device, and still there probably are control
> >sockets buried inside ipv6 that hold ref count.
> >
> >IMHO the kernel should just admit that IPV6 can't be removed.
>
> I cannot accept that. If ipv6.ko has a way to tack ipv6 structs onto all
> sockets, interfaces and addresses, it should also be able to untack it
> again.
Then you do the work and see how incredibly difficult the
implementation is, others have tried. It's not trivial
and at best it's a very time consuming piece of work to
embark on.
Until then it's un-removable, plain as that :-)
I don't know why we're wasting our fingers discussing this
at all to be honest with you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists