[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070927213636.GB7857@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:36:36 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: jblunck@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, agruen@...e.de, tiwai@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch 02/10] Dont touch fs_struct in usermodehelper
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:39:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:46:04AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:12:02PM +0200, jblunck@...e.de wrote:
> > > This test seems to be unnecessary since we always have rootfs mounted before
> > > calling a usermodehelper.
> >
> > Are you sure this is true? I thought we called the usermode helper for
> > hotplug _very_ early in the boot sequence when the device tree starts to
> > get populated.
>
> rootfs is mounted by init_mount_tree, and curret->fs is set up for init
> there aswell. This is called by mnt_init, which is called by
> vfs_caches_init, which is called by start_kernel far before we go to
> rest_init which finally creates a thread to call kernel_init which then
> calls do_basic_setup which calls do_initcalls to initialize drivers and
> afterwards runs the initrd/initramfs.
>
> While the actual function names in main.c changed quite a bit we've
> initialized the initial namespace very early on since the 2.5 days.
Ah, ok, great, thanks for correcting me. I have no objection to this
patch then.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists