[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0A83B4BA-9D5E-4003-AE58-8ED0B4E1243C@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:27:48 -0400
From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Correct SuS compliance for open of large file without options
On Sep 27, 2007, at 17:34:45, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:37:42PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>> That fact that sysfs is all laid out in a directory, but for which
>> some directories/symlinks are OK to use, and some are NOT OK to
>> use --- is why I call the sysfs interface "an open pit".
>
> And because of the original design mistakes, we have only been able
> to change things for the better in a slow manner. We have had
> userspace programs fixed up for _years_ before we are able to make
> the corresponding changes in the kernel, so as to not break the
> distros that are slow to upgrade packages and kernels (like Debian.)
Hey! No poking fingers at Debian here; it's been *MUCH* improved
lately. I far more frequently have problems with boxes still running
some ancient release of RHEL-4 or something than I do with those
running Debian stable (virtually always the latest Debian stable).
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists