[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709271906.48601.rob@landley.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:06:48 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-tiny@...enic.com, Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@...e.celinuxforum.org>,
Michael Opdenacker <michael@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
On Thursday 27 September 2007 2:00:36 am Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> #define KERN_NOTICE "<5>",
>
> #define PRINTK_CONTINUED "",
>
> #define printk(level, str, ...) \
> do { \
> if (sizeof(level) == 1) /* continued printk */\
> actual_printk(str, __VA_ARGS__); \
> else if ((level[1] - '0') < CONFIG_PRINTK_DOICARE) \
> actual_printk(level str, __VA_ARGS__); \
> } while(0);
>
> Then you don't have to change every single printk in the kernel, but
> only those that don't currently come with a log level. More importantly,
> you can do the conversion without a flag day, by spreading (an empty)
> PRINTK_CONTINUED in places that do need a printk without a log level.
The "change every printk in the kernel" suggestion came from me trying to
figure out how to get the printk() calls below a certain log level to
optimize out and not take up space in the binary.
The above doesn't address the original cause of the thread, as far as I can
tell.
> Arnd <><
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists