lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46FB50ED.5000809@davidnewall.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:12:53 +0930
From:	David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
CC:	Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>,
	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>,
	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>, majkls <majkls@...pere.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> You claimed:
>
> <--  snip  -->
>
> Look, when chroot was being designed, I think they intended that even root 
> should be unable to get out. They went so far as to say that dot-dot 
> wouldn't let you out; and it doesn't.
>
> <--  snip  -->
>
> You were clearly saying that whom you call "they" were the people who 
> designed chroot. And it was you who was claiming in this statement that
> "they" said it.

You've ignored the operative phrase, "I think".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ