lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:57:04 +0530
From:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbir@...ibm.com, jlan@...r.sgi.com,
	jlim@....com, oleg@...sign.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] taskstats: fix indentation of long argument lists

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:08:18 +0200
> Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr> wrote:
> 
>> Align with the opening parenthesis.
>>
>> Changelog since V1 (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/21/527):
>> - renamed fill_threadgroup() and add_tsk() to respectively
>> fill_threadgroup_stats() and add_tsk_stats() as suggested by Balbir Singh.
>> - added braces around do/while.
>> - added patch to unbreak binary compatibility between taskstats v5/v6.
>> - split further by preparing the bacct/xacct before the main patch.
>> - some indentation fixes.
> 
> It is unclear to me whether this patch series replaces, augments or
> conflicts with your earlier patch series starting with "taskstats: separate
> PID/TGID stats producers to complete the TGID ones".
> 
> But it doesn't matter much - I think I'll duck both patch series for now. 
> The gap between mainline and -mm is so large that it is becoming
> unmanageable so let's concentrate on the review and stabilisation work for
> now please, rather than adding more stuff.
> 
> Also, I don't think we're seeing enough review and test from people on
> these patch series - I don't have time to do it all.  (Well, apparently I
> do, but I don't think it's a good situation).

Hi, Andrew,

I've been able to review some of these patches, but not test them.
I'll find some time to test these patches.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ