[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070928120331.GC25726@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:03:31 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] lockdep: syscall exit check
> +void lockdep_sys_exit(void)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *curr = current;
> +
> + if (unlikely(curr->lockdep_depth)) {
> + if (!debug_locks_off())
> + return;
> + printk("\n========================================\n");
> + printk( "[ BUG: lock held at syscall exit time! ]\n");
> + printk( "----------------------------------------\n");
> + printk("%s/%d is leaving the kernel with locks still held!\n",
> + curr->comm, curr->pid);
> + lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
> + }
> +}
By the way, the s390 patch I just posted also checks if we hold any locks
when returning from interrupt context to user space. Maybe the above text
could be changed to "lock held when returning to user space" ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists