[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46FD0BA2.6030600@rtr.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:11:46 -0400
From: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
simon.derr@...l.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] disable non-boot CPUs before poweroff
Mark Lord wrote:
>
> We need to disable all CPUs other than the boot CPU (usually 0)
> before attempting to power-off modern SMP machines.
> This seems to fix the hang-on-poweroff issue
> that one of my SMP boxes exhibits. More testing required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com>
> ---
>
> --- linux/kernel/sys.c.orig 2007-09-13 09:49:11.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux/kernel/sys.c 2007-09-28 09:48:54.000000000 -0400
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/getcpu.h>
> #include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
> #include <linux/seccomp.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>
> #include <linux/compat.h>
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> @@ -879,6 +880,7 @@
> if (pm_power_off_prepare)
> pm_power_off_prepare();
> sysdev_shutdown();
> + disable_nonboot_cpus();
> printk(KERN_EMERG "Power down.\n");
> machine_power_off();
> }
Okay, verified now. Prior to this patch, *both* CPUs were still up and running
when machine_power_off() got called, and there was no guarantee that CPU0 was
the one calling machine_power_off(). BUG.
The above patch guarantees that only the single boot CPU is running
and calling machine_power_off().
Hopefully this buries the SMP-power-off bogeyman for good!
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists