[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070928110445.69e687c0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:04:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: corbet@....net (Jonathan Corbet)
Cc: linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Chakri n" <chakriin5@...il.com>
Subject: Re: A unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system on
linux-2.6.23-rc6 (dirty_thresh problem?)
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:28:52 -0600 corbet@....net (Jonathan Corbet) wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > It's unrelated to the actual value of dirty_thresh: if the machine fills up
> > with dirty (or unstable) NFS pages then eventually new writers will block
> > until that condition clears.
> >
> > 2.4 doesn't have this problem at low levels of dirty data because 2.4
> > VFS/MM doesn't account for NFS pages at all.
>
> Is it really NFS-related? I was trying to back up my 2.6.23-rc8 system
> to an external USB drive the other day when something flaked and the
> drive fell off the bus. That, too, was sufficient to wedge the entire
> system, even though the only thing which needed the dead drive was one
> rsync process. It's kind of a bummer to have to hit the reset button
> after the failure of (what should be) a non-critical piece of hardware.
>
> Not that I have a fix to propose...:)
>
That's a USB bug, surely. What should happen is that the kernel attempts
writeback, gets an IO error and then your data gets lost.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists