[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070928111107.57519b67@freepuppy.rosehill>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:11:07 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: jbeulich@...ell.com (Jan Beulich),
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Module use count must be updated as bridges are
created/destroyed
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:37:39 +0800
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> >
> > So we have an unsolvable problem here then, unless infrastructure gets added
> > that allows a module to declare itself as not-implicit-unload-safe, forcing
> > modprobe -r to keep its hands off it. Ugly.
>
> Yes I've always wanted to have a separate count that indicates
> a module is in use but does not prevent its immediate removal.
>
> Cheers,
It is only the nested removal problem.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists