| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1191006971.6702.25.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:16:11 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chakri n <chakriin5@...il.com>,
linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: A unresponsive file system can hang all I/O in the system on
linux-2.6.23-rc6 (dirty_thresh problem?)
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:00:53 -0400 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no> wrote:
> > Do these patches also cause the memory reclaimers to steer clear of
> > devices that are congested (and stop waiting on a congested device if
> > they see that it remains congested for a long period of time)? Most of
> > the collateral blocking I see tends to happen in memory allocation...
> >
>
> No, they don't attempt to do that, but I suspect they put in place
> infrastructure which could be used to improve direct-reclaimer latency. In
> the throttle_vm_writeout() path, at least.
>
> Do you know where the stalls are occurring? throttle_vm_writeout(), or via
> direct calls to congestion_wait() from page_alloc.c and vmscan.c? (running
> sysrq-w five or ten times will probably be enough to determine this)
Looking back, they were getting caught up in
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() and friends. See the attached
example...
Cheers
Trond
Return-Path: <nfs-bounces@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Received: from mail-imap2.uio.no ([unix socket]) by mail-imap2.uio.no
(Cyrus v2.2.12) with LMTPA; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:22:53 +0200
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:22:53 +0200
Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45]) by mail-imap2.uio.no with
esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <nfs-bounces@...ts.sourceforge.net>) id
1IYWIH-0002EY-Dh for trond.myklebust@....uio.no; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:22:53
+0200
Received: from lists-outbound.sourceforge.net ([66.35.250.225]) by
mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from
<nfs-bounces@...ts.sourceforge.net>) id 1IYWI9-0002zq-Gc; Fri, 21 Sep 2007
02:22:53 +0200
Received: from sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net
(sc8-sf-list2-new-b.sourceforge.net [10.3.1.94]) by
sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F8C12977; Thu, 20
Sep 2007 17:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92]
helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp
(Exim 4.43) id 1IYWHp-0002td-Ub for nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net; Thu, 20 Sep
2007 17:22:25 -0700
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.177]) by
mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1IYWHu-0007tE-J1 for
nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:22:30 -0700
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k22so868088waf for
<nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.60.19 with SMTP id i19mr2779265waa.1190334146092; Thu,
20 Sep 2007 17:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.194.16 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <92cbf19b0709201722k6265e647x31b7d25bc54b63a0@...l.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:22:26 -0700
From: "Chakri n" <chakriin5@...il.com>
To: nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net. See
http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to
http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 0.0 RCVD_BY_IP
Received by mail server with no name
Subject: [NFS] NFS on loopback locks up entire system(2.6.23-rc6)?
X-BeenThere: nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and
testing." <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
<mailto:nfs-request@...ts.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=nfs>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@...ts.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
<mailto:nfs-request@...ts.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: nfs-bounces@...ts.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-bounces@...ts.sourceforge.net
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: pass (mail-mx4.uio.no: domain of
lists.sourceforge.net designates 66.35.250.225 as permitted sender)
client-ip=66.35.250.225; envelope-from=nfs-bounces@...ts.sourceforge.net;
helo=lists-outbound.sourceforge.net;
X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found
X-UiO-ClamAV-Virus: No
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.5, required=12.0,
autolearn=disabled, AWL=-1.500)
X-UiO-Scanned: 3BB182E6ACF5F59BE0B44173855B9D28F5EB02CD
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 66.35.250.225 spam_score: -14 maxlevel 99990
minaction 0 bait 0 mail/h: 6 total 73364 max/h 116 blacklist 0 greylist 0
ratelimit 0
X-Evolution-Source: imap://trondmy@...p.uio.no/
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I am testing NFS on loopback locks up entire system with 2.6.23-rc6 kernel.
I have mounted a local ext3 partition using loopback NFS (version 3)
and started my test program. The test program forks 20 threads
allocates 10MB for each thread, writes & reads a file on the loopback
NFS mount. After running for about 5 min, I cannot even login to the
machine. Commands like ps etc, hang in a live session.
The machine is a DELL 1950 with 4Gig of RAM, so there is plenty of RAM
& CPU to play around and no other io/heavy processes are running on
the system.
vmstat output shows no buffers are actually getting transferred in or
out and iowait is 100%.
[root@h46 ~]# vmstat 1
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system--
-----cpu------
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo
in cs us sy id wa st
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 28 345 0
1 0 99 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 5 329 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 26 336 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 8 335 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 26 352 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 8 351 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 23 358 0
1 0 99 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 10 350 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 26 363 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 8 346 0
1 0 99 0
0 24 116 110080 11132 3045664 0 0 0 0 26 360 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11140 3045656 0 0 8 0 11 345 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11140 3045664 0 0 0 0 27 355 0
0 2 97 0
0 24 116 110080 11140 3045664 0 0 0 0 9 330 0
0 0 100 0
0 24 116 110080 11140 3045664 0 0 0 0 26 358 0
0 0 100 0
The following is the backtrace of
1. one of the threads of my test program
2. nfsd daemon and
3. a generic command like pstree, after the machine hangs:
-------------------------------------------------------------
crash> bt 3252
PID: 3252 TASK: f6f3c610 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "test"
#0 [f6bdcc10] schedule at c0624a34
#1 [f6bdcc84] schedule_timeout at c06250ee
#2 [f6bdccc8] io_schedule_timeout at c0624c15
#3 [f6bdccdc] congestion_wait at c045eb7d
#4 [f6bdcd00] balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr at c045ab91
#5 [f6bdcd54] generic_file_buffered_write at c0457148
#6 [f6bdcde8] __generic_file_aio_write_nolock at c04576e5
#7 [f6bdce40] try_to_wake_up at c042342b
#8 [f6bdce5c] generic_file_aio_write at c0457799
#9 [f6bdce8c] nfs_file_write at f8c25cee
#10 [f6bdced0] do_sync_write at c0472e27
#11 [f6bdcf7c] vfs_write at c0473689
#12 [f6bdcf98] sys_write at c0473c95
#13 [f6bdcfb4] sysenter_entry at c0404ddf
EAX: 00000004 EBX: 00000013 ECX: a4966008 EDX: 00980000
DS: 007b ESI: 00980000 ES: 007b EDI: a4966008
SS: 007b ESP: a5ae6ec0 EBP: a5ae6ef0
CS: 0073 EIP: b7eed410 ERR: 00000004 EFLAGS: 00000246
crash> bt 3188
PID: 3188 TASK: f74c4000 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "nfsd"
#0 [f6836c7c] schedule at c0624a34
#1 [f6836cf0] __mutex_lock_slowpath at c062543d
#2 [f6836d0c] mutex_lock at c0625326
#3 [f6836d18] generic_file_aio_write at c0457784
#4 [f6836d48] ext3_file_write at f8888fd7
#5 [f6836d64] do_sync_readv_writev at c0472d1f
#6 [f6836e08] do_readv_writev at c0473486
#7 [f6836e6c] vfs_writev at c047358e
#8 [f6836e7c] nfsd_vfs_write at f8e7f8d7
#9 [f6836ee0] nfsd_write at f8e80139
#10 [f6836f10] nfsd3_proc_write at f8e86afd
#11 [f6836f44] nfsd_dispatch at f8e7c20c
#12 [f6836f6c] svc_process at f89c18e0
#13 [f6836fbc] nfsd at f8e7c794
#14 [f6836fe4] kernel_thread_helper at c0405a35
crash> ps|grep ps
234 2 3 cb194000 IN 0.0 0 0 [khpsbpkt]
520 2 0 f7e18c20 IN 0.0 0 0 [kpsmoused]
2859 1 2 f7f3cc20 IN 0.1 9600 2040 cupsd
3340 3310 0 f4a0f840 UN 0.0 4360 816 pstree
3343 3284 2 f4a0f230 UN 0.0 4212 944 ps
crash> bt 3340
PID: 3340 TASK: f4a0f840 CPU: 0 COMMAND: "pstree"
#0 [e856be30] schedule at c0624a34
#1 [e856bea4] rwsem_down_failed_common at c04df6c0
#2 [e856bec4] rwsem_down_read_failed at c0625c2a
#3 [e856bedc] call_rwsem_down_read_failed at c0625c96
#4 [e856bee8] down_read at c043c21a
#5 [e856bef0] access_process_vm at c0462039
#6 [e856bf38] proc_pid_cmdline at c04a1bbb
#7 [e856bf58] proc_info_read at c04a2f41
#8 [e856bf7c] vfs_read at c04737db
#9 [e856bf98] sys_read at c0473c2e
#10 [e856bfb4] sysenter_entry at c0404ddf
EAX: 00000003 EBX: 00000005 ECX: 0804dc58 EDX: 00000062
DS: 007b ESI: 00000cba ES: 007b EDI: 0804e0e0
SS: 007b ESP: bfa3afe8 EBP: bfa3d4f8
CS: 0073 EIP: b7f64410 ERR: 00000003 EFLAGS: 00000246
----------------------------------------------------------
Any ideas what could potentially trigger this?
Please let me know if you would like to get any other specific details.
Thanks
--Chakri
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@...ts.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists