[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46FE84DE.4090705@goop.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:01:18 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] paravirt_ops: refactor struct paravirt_ops into smaller
pv_*_ops
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> To me such atomicity is provided by the "sti" instruction (i.e. the
> processor begins responding to external, maskable interrupts _after_ the
> next instruction is executed), and there is nothing special with that
> combination "sti; hlt" (you can also have like "sti; ret", for example).
>
Sure, but there's no particular value in "sti; ret". While the sti mask
window works everywhere, its only cases like "sti; hlt" where it's
needed to avoid a race condition.
> So if you define a PV ops like STI(next_instruction), "safe_halt" for
> the native should be defined as STI("hlt"), and inlined as "sti; hlt".
>
That's only meaningful if the pv_op is implemented directly in x86
instructions - ie, the native (or almost native) case.
> If it's hard or we don't need to expose the semantics of "sti" other
> than that, I think it's okay to have a PV operation for safe_halt.
>
Yeah, the general form would be hard to support for a hypervisor. Xen,
for example, has an "atomically enable events and block" operation, but
no other "atomically enable events and do X" operations.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists