linux-kernel - Re: FW: [patch 01/02] vfs: variant symlinks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1191103165.6655.8.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:59:25 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	"Schmidt, Kenneth P" <kenneth.schmidt@....gov>
Cc:	Jan Dittmer <jdi@....org>, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: FW: [patch 01/02] vfs: variant symlinks

On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 12:40 -0700, Schmidt, Kenneth P wrote:

> The best example of how this can be useful is to allow a heterogeneous
> environment which uses a common filesystem. For example, both x86_64 and
> power systems could mount a root nfs share and execute with a common set of
> configurations and data, but the binary directories (bin and lib) could
> point to architecture specific directories.

That would hardly be a portable NFS environment. Boot a Solaris, or
older Linux kernel, and watch your applications barf...

This sort of stuff belongs in the automounter, not the kernel.

Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/