[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709300021.32077.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:21:30 +0200
From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
Cc: jblunck@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@....de, tiwai@...e.de
Subject: Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
Hi Andreas,
On Friday 28 September 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The name path_put_conditional (formerly, dput_path) is a little unclear.
> Replace (path_put_conditional + path_put) with path_walk_put_both,
> "put a pair of paths after a path_walk" (see the kerneldoc).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So why not name it path_walk_put_pair() then?
Rationale: "_both" is just counting, "_pair"
means they are related somehow.
Best regards
Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists