linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070929072831.2df5f5ed@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Sat, 29 Sep 2007 07:28:31 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Cc:	Mark Lord <liml@....ca>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com, bryan@...ores.ca,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata drain fifo on stuck DRQ HSM violation

> > Why 512 words ?
> 
> Though I have queued Mark's patch to be applied, my gut feeling would 
> lean towards a single DRQ block, rather than 512.

Why not just work from the old IDE code.
> 
> 
> >>  	ata_altstatus(ap);
> >> -	ata_chk_status(ap);
> >> +	ata_drain_fifo(ap, qc);
> > 
> > ap->ops->cleanup();
> > 
> > might be wiser
> 
> If someone needs that, they can override the error handler with their 
> own.  No need for a new op.

PDC202xx needs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/