linux-kernel - Re: regression in 2.6.23-rc8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070929082233.GA3447@erig.dyndns.org>
Date:	Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:22:33 +0200
From:	Wolfgang Erig <Wolfgang.Erig@....de>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
Subject: Re: regression in 2.6.23-rc8 - power off failed

Both are bad.
Two different systems and two different bisections.
I sent the last step of each.

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 08:05:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the latest kernel does not power off my system.
> > 
> > 2.6.22 succeeded
> > 2.6.23-rc8 failed
> > 
> > $ git bisect bad  
> > Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this 
> > [f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2] ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling of Sx states.

This is fixed for me after pulling from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
Thankyou and sorry for the noise.

> > 
> > $ git bisect good 
> > Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this 
> > [626073132b381684c4983e0d911e9aceb32e2cbc] Assembly header and main routine for new x86 setup code 
> 
> OK, so which one is the bad one?

This problem (no power off) persists after pull some minutes ago.
Sorry for the confusion.

Wolfgang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/