[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070930115854.GA7697@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:58:55 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] i386: remove comment about barriers
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 08:16:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 03:28:48PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
Thanks v much for confirming, everyone.
> > Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> >
> > ---
> > Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/system.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/system.h
> > @@ -214,11 +214,6 @@ static inline unsigned long get_limit(un
> > */
> >
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Actually only lfence would be needed for mb() because all stores done
> > - * by the kernel should be already ordered. But keep a full barrier for now.
> > - */
> > -
> > #define mb() alternative("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)", "mfence", X86_FEATURE_XMM2)
> > #define rmb() alternative("lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)", "lfence", X86_FEATURE_XMM2)
> >
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists