[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710011240.35802.ak@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:40:35 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -121,8 +121,6 @@ struct resource standard_io_resources[]
> > .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO },
> > { .name = "dma2", .start = 0xc0, .end = 0xdf,
> > .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO },
> > - { .name = "fpu", .start = 0xf0, .end = 0xff,
> > - .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO }
The patch has been dropped meanwhile BTW -- Maciej pointed
out correctly that the south bridges likely decode it anyways.
> Since we are merging x86 and x86-64, I think it would be nice at least
> to CC Thomas on patches that increase 32/64-bit differences... because
> won't this patch have to be partial un-done when we merge i386 and x86-64?
So far I still maintain i386 and x86-64. If Thomas wants to take both
over completely he can do that; but I won't bother handling any patches i didn't
write then anymore.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists