[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710011936.01528.ak@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:36:01 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: "David Bahi" <dbahi@...ell.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, "Gregory Haskins" <GHaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 20:03:12 David Bahi wrote:
> Thanks to tglx and ghaskins for all the help in tracking down a very
> early nmi_watchdog crash on certain x86_64 machines.
The patch is totally bogus. irq 0 doesn't say anything about whether
the current CPU still works or not. You always need some local
interrupt. This basically disables the NMI watchdog for the non boot CPUs.
It's even wrong on i386 -- i wonder how that broken patch
made it in there. I'll remove it there.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists